Battle of pointless operating systems!

[Peegee]

Windows 98 or Windows ME

Which do you prefer (if you had to; and you do). Why?

Be as technical as you'd like. I'm very curious.

[escobert]

98. ME is the worst.

[jrgen]

98 was when Windows started being crap. 95 was good.

[fantasyjunkie]

95 was good so was 98. I never used ME

[Fatal Impurity]

ive never used ME but from what ive heard its the glitchiest thing since Pokemon blue!!

[escobert]

Pokemon blue must be pretty smurfing glitchy.

[Fatal Impurity]

oh the humanity.....how many times have i have to restart pokemon blue because of the smurfing glitches.....still at least it isnt as bad as FF7!

[Zidane Ultimate]

Windows 98 for nostalgic reasons. I've never actually used ME apart from at a friends house, but it worked fine.

And wouldn't this be better called the battle of obsolete operating systems?

[Fatal Impurity]

i think windows XP Service pack 2 should be included.....it has been the worst thing i have ever done to my hardrive to soil it with the service pack 2.......it worked much better and faster with service pack 1!!!

[Nominus Experse]

ME...

It ought to be titled Y2K Bug edition, or something to that effect...

[XxSephirothxX]

Windows ME deserves a very special place in software hell. God, that OS was awful.

[bipper]

98 SE. 98 was [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], as was ME. I mean, [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] son, they were all [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], but the block of [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] known as 98 SE was less [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]astic than the other [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]s. [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], I dunno why they even bothered [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]ting out the [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] hole system restore feature for [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] ME. Short answer, NT < 2000 < XP < [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] < ALL < Linux.

Linux 98 ftw. [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img].

[img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]

[Nominus Experse]

98 SE. 98 was , as was ME. I mean, son, they were all , but the block of known as 98 SE was less astic than the other s. , I dunno why they even bothered ting out the hole system restore feature for ME. Short answer, NT < 2000 < XP < < ALL < Linux.

Linux 98 ftw. .

Wow, bip... 52 skulls in that post...

[Mirage]

If I was to choose a Windows OS from that era, it'd have to be Windows NT 4 with Service Pack 6.

[Flying Mullet]

98 with ease. ME always crashed on me and anytime I tried to change any settings on my comp it would die.