If the titles of Final Fantasy games had any literal relevance to the games themselves, we wouldn't even be discussing this.
Type: Posts; User: Nasarian Altimeros
If the titles of Final Fantasy games had any literal relevance to the games themselves, we wouldn't even be discussing this.
Please tell me you are not attempting to compare the battle mechanics in a cRPG and an action-adventure game.
Oh good God.
I never really felt the whole ‘avoiding enemies in the field’ added a whole load of depth to gameplay tbqh. As long as the random encounter rate isn't set at something ridiculous I don't really care.
FFI: Outdated nonsense.
FFII: Outdated nonsense.
FFIII: Surprisingly non-crap
FFIV: Few interesting invigorations help to cover the fact that it’s outdated nonsense.
FFV: No, we can’t...
Seymour Guardo is by far the most successful villain to come out of the series. Kuja and Kefka were pretty neat too though.
Someone electing to be a woman is a concept so foreign to me that it's not worth me thinking about.
Ultimecia's Castle, incidentally one of the only enjoyable 'dungeons' in FFVIII.
EDIT: Also, the title of this thread is pretty misleading.
So, are we supposed to be rating your comments, or posting our own ratings? I really don’t care enough to do either, although I’ll be interested to know why you voted FFIX and FFIII so low.
...
I'm fairly sure it was 'beacause'.
Several dozen black guys.
Everyone knows the black guys die first, so by the time they've finished chomping through all of them I could easily make my escape.
Japanese, as long as they are under the age of ten.
The anal sex one was better.
Actually, that probably wasn't by the same people who made this one, but the point stands.
The orange.
Yeah, so I pretty much can't post any of them.
42
Someone had to say it.
EDIT: Ok, so someone said it before me but reading that guy's post was like pouring acid into your eyes, and he was 4 integers off, so it doesn't count.
Win
Shakespeare can eat me imho.
Also, no.
In order to be racist he has to believe that white people are superior to other races, or in this case, that black people are inferior to white people. If he said what he did simply because he knew...
It's right there.
Explain to me why this isn't a valid explanation as to how someone can say something racist without being racist themselves.
Good God, it's like 8 posts up
I'm not defending him. I thought we established this when I said 'I'm not saying that what he said wasn't racist in itself, or even that it was acceptable to say'.
Because you know, you're conclusion that Kramer is a racist bigot is a ton more logical than he lost it at some asshole and things got out of hand because he chose the wrong thing to say.
His initial statement was clearly designed to shock them into shutting up. It seemed he thought he had succeeded as well, since he tired to return to his act straight after the initial bout of racial...
To quote my first post:
What that means is, it's entirely possible that he said what he did because he knew it would piss the guy off more than anything else. I honestly don't see why people can't...