![]() |
| | >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
| |
#585 Alright kiddos, STOP WORRYING ABOUT MASONS! Tbh why does it matter!? They are pro town! (exclamation points makes it fact! ) There would be too many now anyway.Ok now look, if I recall correctly, which oh *looks it up* (yes, I do such things, you know.... get evidence, crazy huh!) A mafia cop does the same thing, looks up to find out who is who during the night. A mafia member would know who his team mates are and as you know, this game was smack full of roles. They probably gathered that there were other killing roles. (See Lovers for reference) So of course innocent would be great things to find while looking up. Yes mentioning them isn't so bad either. It clears you from heat such as... now possibly? Preview edit: Oh rinoa posted what I said, just more throughly. |
| | |
| |
| | Oh yes, The Ramza vote hops a lot and randomly and bandwagons alright. First Vote, The Ramza voted Ingus. Changed vote to Barret before day was over. The Ramza voted Barret even though no one else had voted for him. Second day The Ramza keeps The Ramza's vote on Barret. Third day The Ramza remains on Barret until Rinoa and Faris speak out. The Ramza also decides that Barret Lying about Fran's vote was too silly for a Mafia to do. Why would one Lie about something that benefits no one, and yet attracts attention to themselves? This made The Ramza think Barret had just been smurfing up, so The Ramza didn't want to vote due to his error. Fourth day day, The Ramza is the first to voice suspicion against you Fran. Then The Ramza votes after someone else confirms their suspicion of you. My vote stayed all through night 4. In short, The Ramza has not Bandwaggoned until Mog. In addition, The Ramza has changed his vote twice, others have changed more. Um The Ramza stated more on you then that. The Ramza brought up how both you and Fran came at The Ramza for suggesting a possobility. The two of you had claimed that The Ramza was spreading misinformation, regardless of the fact I never claimed anything to be definite. However, Fran did do that. She claimed that her scenario was exactly what happened. You went along with it. Regardless of the fact that there was no more evidence to support that then the Idea the Mafia and one other faction targeted the same person. As shown, you blame The Ramza for spreading misinformation. However, both of you are saying untrue things right now. Tranlsation: 1) I've only changed my vote twice, and I already explained why both times I did it.
2) The only time I bandwaggoned was on Mog. For Ingus, Barret, and Fran, I was among the first to vote or voice suspicion on them. See above quote to see my reasons for not voting Barret. 3) Quina's claim that voting with fran is the only reason stated to be suspicious of him is flat out false, as I had previosly mentioned other reasons why he is a supsect. The Three I bolded are 3 reasons to vote Quina outside of the only two reason he claimed that have been used against him. 4) Quina originally voted for me, claiming I was spreading misinformation, regardless of the fact I simply voiced a possibility, while he and Fran said that I was wrong and they were right, even though there was no evidence suggesting one of the two possibilities was more likely then the other. 5) Both these posts from Fran and Quina are flat out lying. |
| | |
| | Uh, Ramza, seriously. I never lied about anything. You're just mad cause I find your gimmick annoying. I never said that there weren't people who changed their votes more than you, or that you jumped on the bandwagon more than any other player, I said that if you look at your posting history, you have the MOST of all those erratic voting behavior combined. Your voting history looks a lot more suspicious than a lot of other people (who are ALSO suspicious). Trying to outright claim that I'm a liar is so weaksauce cause it's obvious it's not true. Move on, man. You're not gonna win at an argument trying to make me seem like this crazy suspicious mafia player, cause the evidence just isn't there to support you. If you want me out, just say that you think I'm Mafia. Don't go trying to dig up stuff that isn't there. I'm been completely honest about the way I've voted. If anyone has any questions about why I voted for certain people, just ask. But in my opinion, it's pretty obvious as it is. Also, Edge, to clarify something, you are saying that your role is VIGILANTE? Just want to get that straight. |
| | |
| |
Then tell me Fran, what exactly did you mean by saying The Ramza had "The Most" of all these things? |
| | |
| | A Vigilante doesn't need to kill every night. The Vigilante is essentially a Night-Lyncher, and he's the only voter. I made the mistake of nabbing Barret, and I bought into the hype that he's a Mafia from other people. The first night of Vigilante was under my control alone, before some things turned up and I couldn't get on. That's when the other half of Edge came in and took control for a bit. Before that happened, though, I had managed to kill Barret. It was a quick decision and I was just jumping in. To answer your question, Rinoa, I think that Freya was lying. Obviously not in her role-claim, but in the death of Auron. It wouldn't make sense otherwise. However, while I have come up with whom I want to vote for in the lynching, the other player of Edge has not. Assassination is a less productive tool, as with only one voter, there's a less likely chance the guess is correct. I want to ensure we're right with whom we kill. But when the Lynching gets it wrong, I can't help but want to take the one I suspected during the night. |
| | |
| | Apparently the earlier replacement was inactive so that's why no one was killed those nights. And I'm not allowed to kill too many innocent townies by accident. But, I can kill as much as I want or not at all. Mafia must not have killed anyone that night. Yeah, just vigilante. No daytime, no over-eager, just plain Jane. EDIT: Oops, sorry replacement replacement. |
| | |
| | I didn't say there were no reasons, I said there were no GOOD reasons. Your post just brings up the crap reasons again. The idea you presented on Day 2 was stupid so I attacked it. Fran attacked it too. Because it was stupid. |
| | |
| |
| |