Pink Floyd mildly annoys me. - Page 5

eestlinc · 09-30-2004, 07:34 AM

Eddie Vedder is cool. Pearl Jam is high quality. My opinion counts more than yours because I have a music degree. I hope you all die.

I like Pink Floyd. They got a bit goofy but they did some great stuff. I was listening to Wish You Were Here tonight. Good stuff.

I really don't like the Beatles, though. Or the Rolling Stones. Or Blur or Oasis.

Yamaneko · 09-30-2004, 07:38 AM

The Floyd did produce albums lacking quality after Waters left, but in no way are they horrible attempts at making music. The Division Bell isn't half bad. Plus, not many bands can say that they produced four perfect albums (Dark Side, WYWH, Animals, The Wall).

eestlinc · 09-30-2004, 07:41 AM

Radiohead has produced two. Pearl Jam produced two or three (at least to me). Yea, four is pretty good. If you think all four are perfect.

did you trade a walk-on part in the war for a lstarring role in a cage?

Doomgaze · 09-30-2004, 08:23 AM

5, Meddle >=[

actually, Animals is a bit iffy.

eest - yeah, Pearl Jam's good, but Eddie Vedder just annoys me for some reason. Temple of the Dog was much better than Pearl Jam, anyway.

And I don't get how you could possibly not like the Beatles. Especially, say, Rubber Soul and later. Yeah, their early stuff wasn't very good, but...

Yamaneko · 09-30-2004, 08:30 AM

The Beatles were only good because they mainstreamed Rock (or maybe that's a bad thing), and they had a few good songs. The Rolling Stones were only good because they portrayed the first "bad guys" of Rock, and they had a few good songs.

I have nothing against Pearl Jam. They know how to play.

Meddle had some iffy tracks (San Tropez, Seamus).

Miriel · 09-30-2004, 08:34 AM

Citizen Kane

Just watched it for like the 10th time in Film class and I still don't get why people consider this movie to be a masterpiece. It's a good movie, and some of the technical aspects of the movie are brilliant, but best movie of all time? Hardly.

Spaceman Spiff · 09-30-2004, 09:26 PM

AC/DC annoys the hell out of me. I love it when ALice Cooper makes fun of them on his radio show. Them and Rush. Love it.

Moose Knight · 09-30-2004, 11:13 PM

Originally Posted by Miriel

Citizen Kane

Just watched it for like the 10th time in Film class and I still don't get why people consider this movie to be a masterpiece. It's a good movie, and some of the technical aspects of the movie are brilliant, but best movie of all time? Hardly.

You lose. This movie rules because it has Orson Welles, the biggest hero of all time.

eestlinc Cid's Knight cowboy Location: howdy howdy howdy	#33 Eddie Vedder is cool. Pearl Jam is high quality. My opinion counts more than yours because I have a music degree. I hope you all die. I like Pink Floyd. They got a bit goofy but they did some great stuff. I was listening to Wish You Were Here tonight. Good stuff. I really don't like the Beatles, though. Or the Rolling Stones. Or Blur or Oasis.
09-30-2004, 07:34 AM

Yamaneko ..a Russian mountain cat. Location: Los Angeles, CA	#34 (permalink) The Floyd did produce albums lacking quality after Waters left, but in no way are they horrible attempts at making music. The Division Bell isn't half bad. Plus, not many bands can say that they produced four perfect albums (Dark Side, WYWH, Animals, The Wall).
09-30-2004, 07:38 AM

eestlinc Cid's Knight cowboy Location: howdy howdy howdy	#35 (permalink) Radiohead has produced two. Pearl Jam produced two or three (at least to me). Yea, four is pretty good. If you think all four are perfect. did you trade a walk-on part in the war for a lstarring role in a cage?
09-30-2004, 07:41 AM

Doomgaze Banned	#36 (permalink) 5, Meddle >=[ actually, Animals is a bit iffy. eest - yeah, Pearl Jam's good, but Eddie Vedder just annoys me for some reason. Temple of the Dog was much better than Pearl Jam, anyway. And I don't get how you could possibly not like the Beatles. Especially, say, Rubber Soul and later. Yeah, their early stuff wasn't very good, but...
09-30-2004, 08:23 AM

Yamaneko ..a Russian mountain cat. Location: Los Angeles, CA	#37 (permalink) The Beatles were only good because they mainstreamed Rock (or maybe that's a bad thing), and they had a few good songs. The Rolling Stones were only good because they portrayed the first "bad guys" of Rock, and they had a few good songs. I have nothing against Pearl Jam. They know how to play. Meddle had some iffy tracks (San Tropez, Seamus).
09-30-2004, 08:30 AM

Miriel Cid's Knight permanently mitten Location: Los Angeles	#38 (permalink) Citizen Kane Just watched it for like the 10th time in Film class and I still don't get why people consider this movie to be a masterpiece. It's a good movie, and some of the technical aspects of the movie are brilliant, but best movie of all time? Hardly.
09-30-2004, 08:34 AM

Spaceman Spiff Sexy McAwesome Location: Coolsville	#39 (permalink) AC/DC annoys the hell out of me. I love it when ALice Cooper makes fun of them on his radio show. Them and Rush. Love it.
09-30-2004, 09:26 PM

Moose Knight gdsgdsgdsgdsgdsgdsgdsgdsg Location: 19th Century London	#40 (permalink) Originally Posted by Miriel Citizen Kane Just watched it for like the 10th time in Film class and I still don't get why people consider this movie to be a masterpiece. It's a good movie, and some of the technical aspects of the movie are brilliant, but best movie of all time? Hardly. You lose. This movie rules because it has Orson Welles, the biggest hero of all time.
09-30-2004, 11:13 PM