![]() |
| | >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
| |
#9 He did Batman and Batman Returns. Schumacher did the rest until Nolan took over. |
| | |
| |
| | So I take it you didn't have a problem with Spider-Man 1? Because that film kind of had a paper thin plot. Peter and MJ's relationship wasn't very deep and meaningful in my opinion I think it was about as deep and meaningful as Bruce and Vicki's relationship in the 1989 Batman film...which wasn't very deep and meaningful at all. Last edited by John_912; 08-15-2008 at 06:06 PM. |
| | |
| Cid's Knight | I agree with this. Also, sometimes plots are nothing more than ways to string along concepts. I just watched "Shoot 'Em Up" last night, which has a plot that's barely there, but it works pretty well for what it was trying to do. So as long as the plot isn't profoundly stupid, I think simple stories can work. |
| | |
| | If someone is going to make a movie with a paper thin plot they need to make sure the characters are interesting and the film is edited well. One of my favourite movies of all time is Mad Max 2 and I didn't love it for the story, it was the well presented action and cool characters that made it so good. So in answer to your question, no the plot of a movie doesn't have to have much depth or meaning for it to be good. Oh and Burton's Batman's were incredibly well done if I don't say so myself. I understand what your saying about Burton movies in general but he puts so much emphasis on the characters and sets that his movies are always worthwhile. |
| | |