![]() |
| | >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
| |
#1 I'm certain there's a multitude of other places I could've put this thread, but I figgered this was the one what got the most traffic. In any case, while playing a game where armor and weapons are available, which do you emphasize more and why? |
| | |
| |
| Site Staff Cid's Knight | Threads need to go in the forum they best fit, not the forum that gets the most traffic. *moves to gen gaming* Weapons versus armor? I usually pick armor first. I've never really thought about why, it's just a habit I've developed over the years. |
| | |
| | Anyway, it depends on the game. If dodging is a common possibility, I'll probably find a weapon that works with that, and then get armor that helps my speed. If dodging isn't, then I'll make sure I have good defense for whatever's thrown at me. Last edited by Kentarou; 05-30-2008 at 08:03 PM. Reason: Looks like it's already there. |
| | |
| | I usually go for weapons. Most games use very large numbers when calculating damages, and as such, weapons usually need to have higher stats than armors do, and get the benefit of the formula behind it. Rarely if ever will you do negative damage if the function looks like (Attack Damage - Armor Amount), unless an element is involved. Additionally, games also usually provide two opportunities to mitigate damage: running and dodging. Now, if the armors had counter capabilities or special mods, this might be a different discussion. It also depends on the availability of healing. If it's free like in Pokemon, who cares what your defense is; if it's not, then you'd probably want to watch a little more closely. This also depends on how severe the penalty for dying is; if you're a level 70 Paladin in Diablo II, you can die all you want. If you're a level 92 Sorceress, you might care more. |
| | |