Eyes on Final Fantasy Forums > Final Fantasy: Nerds in Paradise > Final Fantasy II > Should Lionheart really be considered a "main character"?

[ReloadPsi]

Yeah, Leon just pissed me off. When he joined he had half the HP of everyone else, and I was stuck with him. I would rather have taken Leyla, or maybe even Minwu if he hadn't frickin' killed himself.

[FuzZerd]

for me he had about as much health as firion. and now he has more.

[Peter_20]

Originally Posted by FuzZerd ^

for me he had about as much health as firion. and now he has more.

Tell that to us level-maniacs who just love to abuse the level system.

[Crossblades]

One could say that he's the main character since most of the story deals with him anyway.

[Peter_20]

Originally Posted by Crossblades ^

One could say that he's the main character since most of the story deals with him anyway.

No. Actually, he's absent for the most part of the game.

With all respect, this is almost like saying Garland is the main character in FF1.

[Crossblades]

Originally Posted by Peter_20 ^

Originally Posted by Crossblades ^

One could say that he's the main character since most of the story deals with him anyway.

No. Actually, he's absent for the most part of the game.

With all respect, this is almost like saying Garland is the main character in FF1.

I said ONE could say, as in anyone could say. I didn't say he actually is the main character

[DarkLadyNyara]

No. Actually, he's absent for the most part of the game.

Actually, you do encounter him throughout the game, as the Dark Knight. Whereas Garland is only seen once at the beginning of the game, and once at the end. Beleive me, I'd love to deny that little twit main character status, but unfortunatly, he qualifies.

[fearlessat30]

I agree. Plus the fact that Garland doesn't turn tail and run towards the winning side. As sad as it as, I believe Frionel, (Leonhart in my game) has to be a main character, just not a hero.