![]() | |
![]() | |
| |
| ||||
In situations such that this, it's more like the 70s. Now being unable to climb the corperate ladder, that's a horse of a different color!
04-02-2006, 10:02 PM
|
| ||||
I'm inclined to agree with you. Though I do try to keep my mouth shut for fear of feeling like a traitor.
04-02-2006, 10:11 PM
|
| ||||
| If your desire to discuss the attractiveness of celebrities is really that large (or, probably more accurately, your desire to 'stick one to the staff' [precious, precious pride, we must let you soar]), please do so in GC, and tastefully. Leeza felt that that thread was not in conjunction with the tasteful and serious tones of the eoeo forum, and I agree with her, and that is why it was not allowed.
04-02-2006, 10:13 PM
|
| ||||
Up to a point almost all subjects are permitted in EoEO, yes. However, the final say does come from Staff. The thread was posted in EoEO, but I do agree about nik. Although I don't think that he'll be posting that pic ever again. ![]()
04-02-2006, 10:16 PM
|
| ||||
| Hmmm, I understand what you all are saying and I don't understand why Leeza's trying to boast around with the argument of the dictionary, do you not havce a mind of your own and the dictionary was created by people so as in that it is simply what the people want to make out of the word which means that really all words don't really have a true meaning and as my final statement I think that it was wrong they weren't showing porn or saying sexist things about them right and it was boys only too correct?
04-02-2006, 10:16 PM
|
| ||||
I realize it was posted in EoEO. I'm agreeing that it should be posted in EoEO, if the poster wishes to avoid "funny" [read: not funny] posts. You skipped my first question.
04-02-2006, 10:18 PM
|