![]() |
| >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
| Administrator |
#49 All in all, it's whatever Cid agrees with. ![]() |
| | |
| |
| Banned | That's pauper. And I'm glad someone took some recognition to it, I think it works better than the other two system as it allows a better dividing branch for future games, where as, as soon as the next gen consoles are released, we can add the next generation category for the new games. Therefore, we also add a time line from the late 80's all the way to present. |
| | |
| Administrator | While I agree with Marick's naming idea (First Generation, Second Generation, etc), I don't think it should be done with subcatgories for a start as that would only add to the mess, nor do I agree with having categories for three games. I say we go with Proto's three categories, but have them named First Generation, Second Generation, and then, to save on predictability of "Misc" or "Other", we can go with the correct answer, which is obviously "Yes". Also, with the ever-increasing likelihood of re-released of the earlier FF's, I think that making it FFI-III and FFIV would defeat the purpose of splitting up those forums. Even if they aren't re-released, I still think they all deserve their own forum. Having a whole lot of games in one forum doesn't make people start threads about the other games than what they're playing any faster. The only difference is that it adds to confusion. I see no benefit whatsoever when it comes to keeping the early FF's together. EDIT: I've raised this up in the Staff Forum, so now we can just wait and see. |
| | |
| Administrator | Yes, but with nearly all the games now (or soon to be) covering multiplatform, that doesn't really matter anymore. |
| | |
| Banned | Sadly, people like to assume any 3-D game is new-school... |
| | |