Eyes on Final Fantasy Forums > Reference > General Archive > Feedback Forum Archive > Grammar nazi.

[Doomie]

Soup Nazi > Grammar Nazi IMO.

[rubah]

Originally Posted by Cloud No.9

so is it jesus's blood or jesus' blood?

My guess would be the former.

[Big D]

Originally Posted by Raistlin

The "if it ends in an s, just add an apostrophe" rule is a myth. You only just add the apostrophe if the word is a plural. Proper nouns, as always, follow the standard rules. This has bugged me for years - it's not Bleys' crotch, it's Bleys's crotch. If you say the former out loud, you are really saying "Bley's crotch."

Nope! Maybe in US grammar, but in England it's always been fine to add an apostrophe at the end of words ending in 's'. If there's already an 's' sound, it just sounds ridiculous if you have to add another 's' sound to make the possessive. "Jesusiz blood", anyone?

[eestlinc]

US grammar > UK grammar

[Hawkeye]

Damn Brits

[Kawaii Ryûkishi]

C'mon now none of that. Eh wot.

[Raistlin]

Psy: actually, according to my former English teacher, it's apparently okay now to split infinitives. I still, however, strongly disagree with it, and for the most part choose to disregard that knowledge.

Nope! Maybe in US grammar, but in England it's always been fine to add an apostrophe at the end of words ending in 's'. If there's already an 's' sound, it just sounds ridiculous if you have to add another 's' sound to make the possessive. "Jesusiz blood", anyone?

But then how could you possibly distinguish between Bley's crotch and Bleys' crotch? It makes absolutely no sense. It's fishes' scales, but Bleys's crotch. Proper nouns ALWAYS go by standard grammar rules - therefore, unless it's plural, add 's. It's the same logic behind "Final Fantasys." If you refute one, you can't possibly justify the other.

[Yamaneko]

Ironically, it's us Yanks adding extra letters to words in this case.