Okay, so who determines that I'm spamming? - Page 4

Agent Proto · 05-14-2005, 05:48 AM

Originally Posted by Yamaneko

Spamming is overrated anyway.

Quoted for truth.

And yes, the spam has gone overboard that it lost its notability.

Psychotic · 05-14-2005, 05:55 AM

Who cares if "spam" is rated higher than it should be or if it isn't notable? That's not the point of it, the point of it is to have fun. I'm pretty confident most of the members enjoy what you like to call "spam", and that it's a small minority who have an issue with it.

TheAbominatrix · 05-14-2005, 06:04 AM

It's not that spam annoys people, it's that excessive amounts are annoying. Its funny sometimes. Constantly, it's just annoying. But it really doesnt matter, because this argument just goes on and on.

I dont see why anyone bothers, because there's boards that have spam forums, so why not just go to them for that?

Agent Proto · 05-14-2005, 06:06 AM

Originally Posted by Psychotic

Who cares if "spam" is rated higher than it should be or if it isn't notable? That's not the point of it, the point of it is to have fun. I'm pretty confident most of the members enjoy what you like to call "spam", and that it's a small minority who have an issue with it.

You fail to realize that while spam can be fun, it's also part of the reason why some threads are getting closed.

Psychotic · 05-14-2005, 06:13 AM

Originally Posted by TheAbominatrix

I dont see why anyone bothers, because there's boards that have spam forums, so why not just go to them for that?

Well in that case, I don't see why anyone bothers to complain about spam, because there's boards for non-spam discussion, so why not just go to them for that?

Originally Posted by pr00t

You fail to realize that while spam can be fun, it's also part of the reason why some threads are getting closed.

...huh? I always knew that threads were closed due to "spam", I just don't get why people are so uptight about it when it doesn't harm anyone. Oh, server space? Okay, here you go *clicks banner ads fervently* Problem solved.

Leeza · 05-14-2005, 06:15 AM

Psy, don't you get enough of a spam fix with User Notes?

Agent Proto · 05-14-2005, 06:17 AM

No, it doesn't harm server space. Spam isn't bad, but it just seems that it degrades the value of some threads. If only a few people are posting so much in such little time, that leaves out other people from wanting to add something, because their post would likely be skipped from the many posts the few posters have posted.

TheAbominatrix · 05-14-2005, 06:21 AM

Originally Posted by Psychotic

Originally Posted by TheAbominatrix

I dont see why anyone bothers, because there's boards that have spam forums, so why not just go to them for that?

Well in that case, I don't see why anyone bothers to complain about spam, because there's boards for non-spam discussion, so why not just go to them for that?

Originally Posted by pr00t

You fail to realize that while spam can be fun, it's also part of the reason why some threads are getting closed.

...huh? I always knew that threads were closed due to "spam", I just don't get why people are so uptight about it when it doesn't harm anyone. Oh, server space? Okay, here you go *clicks banner ads fervently* Problem solved.

This board has non-spam discussion, so that doesnt make any sense. And I'm not complaining, and I dont think anyone ever bothers to complain about the spam here. I just dont see the point about worrying about those 'stuck up' folks who wont let us spam constantly, when there's boards dedicated solely to spam, not to mention, as Leeza said, the user notes which are nothing but.

Not everyone gets joy or amusement from reading pages and pages of spam.

Agent Proto Former Staff Location: Root Beer Forum	#25 Originally Posted by Yamaneko Spamming is overrated anyway. Quoted for truth. And yes, the spam has gone overboard that it lost its notability.
05-14-2005, 05:48 AM

Psychotic Cid's Knight For Mother Russia Location: I'll be late for bread line.	#26 (permalink) Who cares if "spam" is rated higher than it should be or if it isn't notable? That's not the point of it, the point of it is to have fun. I'm pretty confident most of the members enjoy what you like to call "spam", and that it's a small minority who have an issue with it.
05-14-2005, 05:55 AM

TheAbominatrix Recognized Member Queen of Gonzo Location: Corona, California	#27 (permalink) It's not that spam annoys people, it's that excessive amounts are annoying. Its funny sometimes. Constantly, it's just annoying. But it really doesnt matter, because this argument just goes on and on. I dont see why anyone bothers, because there's boards that have spam forums, so why not just go to them for that?
05-14-2005, 06:04 AM

Leeza Administrator rowr Location: The long hard road out of hell.	#30 (permalink) Psy, don't you get enough of a spam fix with User Notes?
05-14-2005, 06:15 AM

Agent Proto Former Staff Location: Root Beer Forum	#31 (permalink) No, it doesn't harm server space. Spam isn't bad, but it just seems that it degrades the value of some threads. If only a few people are posting so much in such little time, that leaves out other people from wanting to add something, because their post would likely be skipped from the many posts the few posters have posted.
05-14-2005, 06:17 AM