Eyes on Final Fantasy Forums > Reference > General Archive > Feedback Forum Archive > But the rules don't SAY that.

[m4tt]

Uhh yes, I think it was. Kishi chose my name so he must of been in a TMNT mood.

[Yamaneko]

Originally Posted by Raistlin

Bleys: the UYFB rule doesn't apply here, 'cause they WERE when they realized that two of the same image would not impact the loading times anymore then one. Well, you could say Kane's sig was taken back down after he put 24 of the same image in his sig, which would kinda apply with the UYFB rule. Ah well.

The UYFB rule does not only apply to technicalities, but also to subjective matters, like actions that piss people off.

[MecaKane]

Originally Posted by Agent Proto

Every forum have unwritten rules that should be understood by everyone. Having an annoying signature being "against" the rules of signature is one of them.

Who's to say what's annoying!
I find people's sigs where they have links to their boy/girlfriend's profile more annoying than most sigs, let alone one that's not meant to be taken seriously, at all.
Of all the MSpaint sigs, crappy poetry sigs, sigs with :chop: or in them, mine was the most annoying, I guess.

[Agent Proto]

Well, in terms of annoying the staff, yes.

[Psychotic]

You forgot the countless Eizon advertisings too.

[Baloki]

Or people just dislike you/like winding you up Kane, but hey if your happy moaning I'm all up for popcorn and camp fires

[ShlupQuack]

The situation as I understand it:

1) Someone (I forget who) didn't understand the whole cache thing, and took the sig down.
2) Kane responded innapropraitely, adding the image multiple times.
3) His signature privilages were removed due to this innapropriate response.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, since I missed the whole thing.

[Raistlin]

Originally Posted by ShlupQuack

1) Someone (I forget who) didn't understand the whole cache thing, and took the sig down.
2) Kane responded innapropraitely, adding the image multiple times.
3) His signature privilages were removed due to this innapropriate response.

More or less. Except for the fact that no one's admitting that Kane's original sig wasn't against the rules in the first place.