![]() |
| | >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
| |
#9 I'f you're using css you should add the body colours into the css too, it'll look a lot neater and you'll have more control. Same with the fonts. It saves looking for the line of code when you can just quickly access the css if anything needs changing. |
| | |
| |
| Site Staff | I think the design is very nice. The main thing I'd recommend is using CSS to tidy up the code, but hey - it's not code I'm going to be developing, so whatever suits you more. Maybe it would be a good idea to use a <div style="width: 813px; height: 406px; overflow: auto;"> to deal with the scrolling part of the page. Frames lead to unpredictable behaviour of the browser, like back buttons not working and if you wanted to include Javascript, you could easily get into strife. ![]() EDIT: The current code does adhere to web standards. The only thing that is missing is the DOCTYPE declaration at the top of the source, but that in no way affects the rendering of the page. |
| | |
| Site Staff Cid's Knight | dammit, I don't trust myself to quote shlup's post without erasing all of her post again, so uh, just going to use quickreply xD Your New Best Friend (or worst enemy) [Invalid] Markup Validation of http://blackbirdmurder.com/ - W3C Markup Validator |
| | |
| | My mistake then. I only did a quick check of the code and saw no doctype. A missing DOCTYPE declaration can affect the rendering of the website though, as browsers will render the website in quirks mode then. Also see here: Activating Browser Modes with Doctype The div-solution instead of a real frame would get my support, too. |
| | |
| Site Staff Cid's Knight | I thought you could manipulate the scrollbar's style in Firefox too. After some searching I realized that you're right and it can't be done without some funky javascript that sort of hacks up the W3C standard. |
| | |