Eyes on Final Fantasy Forums > General > Artist's Forum > Some recent female art

[scrumpleberry]

I think keeping your strokes more consistent would help. Brilliant sense of composition/colour though.

[Helen]

Originally Posted by scrumpleberry ^

I think keeping your strokes more consistent would help. Brilliant sense of composition/colour though.

Thank you for tip and comments.

[Aerith's Knight]

eeewww.. thats disguisting.. thats not even skinny anymore.. i like my girls to have at least a little stuffing..

good art though.. just a little tweeking in the neck bit..

[Helen]

Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight ^

eeewww.. thats disguisting.. thats not even skinny anymore.. i like my girls to have at least a little stuffing..

good art though.. just a little tweeking in the neck bit..

Thank you, the idea is that the model is oblivious to how skinny she is, pains of the model. Seeing things are they are, maybe a little exaggerated to express artistic meaning.

[Avarice-ness]

I <3 adobe.

But it kind of looks like you just used a filter over a picture and then airbrushed or painted over it.

The only reason I say it is due to the texture's and shadings of the pictures. In the top picture, the torso and up is CLEARLY a different color than below the torso, and "shadowing" or not, it wouldn't be that drastic. The rock's also look just filtered, the squiggles put there for blending purposes.

I don't know though. I like the faces, they're clean and well done, but they don't match the rest of the body. I guess you could call that expressionism, but expressionisms such a vague word now a days..

Still they're nice. I think you should work more on a low opacity brush with painting, it'll work more like layering paints like you would with acrlyics.

[Helen]

Originally Posted by Avarice-ness ^

I <3 adobe.

But it kind of looks like you just used a filter over a picture and then airbrushed or painted over it.

The only reason I say it is due to the texture's and shadings of the pictures. In the top picture, the torso and up is CLEARLY a different color than below the torso, and "shadowing" or not, it wouldn't be that drastic. The rock's also look just filtered, the squiggles put there for blending purposes.

I don't know though. I like the faces, they're clean and well done, but they don't match the rest of the body. I guess you could call that expressionism, but expressionisms such a vague word now a days..

Still they're nice. I think you should work more on a low opacity brush with painting, it'll work more like layering paints like you would with acrlyics.

I colored it all legitly but to make the rocks I added noise . Yes adobe was the program. I used alot of one pixel brushing. The face took awhile the body was much rushed on both actually.

[Omecle]

Originally Posted by Avarice-ness ^

Still they're nice. I think you should work more on a low opacity brush with painting, it'll work more like layering paints like you would with acrlyics.

Or consider using the airbrush tool, and setting your Flow to 1%. It works a lot better than mucking around with the opacity. Though, sometimes you can get some really good effects with using both methods.

Anyway, I still am not sure why you put squiggly lines all over the background? The shadows seem a bit weird too and there seems to be blurring in bits that make the painting inconsistent. Also, try and avoid the Noise filter for things such as this, it's not its intended purpose and in my opinion ruins the background tremendously.

So yeah, keep it up and post some more.

[rubah]

I prefer to paint with the paintbrush then use the smudge tool to control it more effectively. It's like painting with acrylics!