Eyes on Final Fantasy Forums > Reference > General Archive > April Fool's Forum > April Fools - Advance planning & ideas - CENSORED THREAD

[crono_logical]

Um, we can't have Big D banning Kishi can we? I thought knights couldn't ban other knights?

[Kawaii Ryûkishi]

How are we going to dodge the question when people ask for a description of the image?

[Big D]

Originally Posted by Kawaii Ryûkishi

How are we going to dodge the question when people ask for a description of the image?

We say something wordy yet vague, for instance:

"It was a highly suggestive image of male homoeroticism, depticing lust and longing between two video game characters. The purpose was clearly not artistic; arousal was the intended goal. Thus, the image was too deeply within the realm of the pornographic, and had to be treated as any other pornographic image would be. The content was simply too explicit, too blatantly erotic to be overlooked as mere humour or commentary."

Something like that could well satisfy people's enquiries without actually telling them anything about what the picture looked like.

[Loony BoB]

Or simply "Some hentai picture."

[Kawaii Ryûkishi]

"With tentacles."

[Loony BoB]

I think even I'd have to ban you for that. xD

Hmm. Actually, it could be a pic of a girl with a tentacle up her skirt. No nudity but still well beyond suggestive, so it gives us a better reason to argue. "There was no nudity..."

Of coures, all the people out there would be enraged. Perfect for April Fools.

[RSL]

I'll stay on.

[Del Murder]

'pm me and I'll show you the picture'

Then just never reply. Or reply with something like 'I can't be arsed to find it right now. I'll get it later.' Or just use BoB's description. I think it would be funnier if we only give them bits and pieces and let them speculate, though. 'It was a picture involving tentacles. That's all I'm going to say', 'It had a young girl in it, and I'm quite sure what she was doing was unbecoming for someone of her age', 'It depicted an act illegal in 43 states', etc.

BoB, I agree that your option 1 would be more believable. The only problem is that 3 of those four members are either currently inactive, or just got back from a long period of inactivity. It doesn't seem like that would have as much of an impact as someone as post happy as myself or Yams stepping down.

With option 2 I could quit because you guys removed Feedback, a forum I love to spam in. Yams would be last and he could name any number of reasons: 'No fun without Del', 'I agree with Unne/Leeza', 'Too much drama', etc.