 |
|
| | >>> Click
here to download Final Fantasy Ringtones |
 |
#33  Skimming through the topic regarding the incident again, there were a couple of interesting ideas that I think were worth noting, ideas that both Nik and Proto posted. Perhaps they warrant some serious discussion? Take care all. |
03-26-2005, 10:26 AM
| 
|
| |
 | And that would result in getting banned? Regardless of what ideas have been proposed, they will not be discussed simply because they will disrupt the order of things around here. I took the time to post my thoughts and solutions, and it was completely ignored. Why should I further continue to try to help people who do not even care? Del Snizz made a beautiful statement about the order of things in this world, including this board, and it will be ignored, simply because the more incendiary an idea is, the more likely it can and will be deleted by those in power simply so they may mantain power and order. Where's my post? Oh, that's right, it's spam. Why is it spam? Because even if I actually said anything worth noting (as I have done around here in the past), the result will be the same. Why not just spam all the time? It doesn't matter - no one listens anyways. And now you have the basis behind most of the problems that happen around here - no one is listening. |
|
03-26-2005, 10:53 AM
|
|
 | I response to The Captain's original post, it's an excellent idea in theory, but whether a sensible and sound set of terms could be agreed isn't so clear cut. Who would be responsible for the creation of this new constitution? If every member were to have their say then we'd end up with a constitution full of unecessary, senseless rubbish. If the job were left to a select few then it's unlikely anything would change at all, and the document would not be taken seriously by the majority of members. So although a properly drafted set of terms would probably have great benefits for EoFF, the difficulty of actually creating it might be the idea's undoing. |
|
03-26-2005, 12:51 PM
|
|
| | "Who would be responsible for the creation of this new constitution? If every member were to have their say then we'd end up with a constitution full of unecessary, senseless rubbish. If the job were left to a select few then it's unlikely anything would change at all, and the document would not be taken seriously by the majority of members." If the idea does have any backing, perhaps make up a committee of members, both on Staff and off Staff who are well respected and have the support of the board. That way, in effect, the voices of the majority and those who might want to make changes can be heard within reason. Take care all, and thanks for the feedback thus far. |
|
03-26-2005, 08:42 PM
|
|
