Thread: Grammar
View Single Post
The Unknown Guru
We Must Repeat
The Unknown Guru's Avatar
Location: D-E-V-O!
#27
Default

Originally Posted by Scarmiglione ^
Originally Posted by Raistlin ^
If you're ever writing something where grammar is an issue, you shouldn't be using contractions in the first place.

That said, grammatically, "could've" and "should've" are fine as far as I know. MSWord does not consider them a misspelling.
Yes they are correct. Contractions of "could/should have." The error would be saying "could/should of" or "coulda/shoulda."
Ugh, I absolutely hate "should/could of". Just because that's what it sounds like when you say it fast doesn't mean it's right.
Old 04-26-2008, 09:53 PM
Reply With Quote
The Unknown Guru is offline